In our
static and kinetic friction lab, we were able to see how the weight of an
object affects its friction, measure its coefficients, and decipher is the
weight affects the coefficient. We were able to do all of these things and come
up with a solid conclusion in the end. We were able to see through the use of
F=umg, that the weight of the object didn’t matter in finding its coefficient.
Using the same equation for our different sets of data, both average
coefficients of kinetic friction is within a couple hundredths of each other.
The coefficient is not based upon weight because when we are finding the
coefficient, we use the formulas that a=mg and F=ma. We end up dividing the two
formulas so in the end we divide out the mass of the object making it useless.
Through this lab, we were able to track the forces needed in static friction
and kinetic friction. In graph #1, we see that there is a greater force needed
at the start because of the static friction (labeled in green). My partners and
I were able to do this lab fairly easily, though at the beginning there was
communication error and not too long after that I mistook 500 g for 500 kg,
throwing off my data. If I let it throw off my data by that much, I would have
had to divide by a much bigger normal force. Through everything, I found this
lab to be very fun and very informative and teaching for the concepts of static
and kinetic friction through the use of wooden blocks.
Be isolated, be ignored, be attacked, be in doubt, be frightened, but do not be silenced. - Bertrand Russell.
Monday, October 21, 2013
Monday, September 30, 2013
Free Fall Lab Conclusion
My partner and I were able to analyze a graph of a bungee
jumper during free fall and the acceleration during the time the cord was
stretching. We were able to compare our testing jump simulation to that of a
real life jump. We were able to do these things and learn a lot. We were able
to see that free fall does only have the acceleration a gravity (-9.8 m/s^2).
We saw how the highest peak on the graph matched up to when our man was the
lowest and had the bungee stretched out. We were able to see the acceleration
during the bounces and at different times (in seconds). We were able to use the
graphs to determine what was asked in the objectives, such as, we labeled on
Graph #2 where the acceleration was the maximum and the minimum.
We saw
Physics’ concepts in our lab when we realized that forces were at play. We saw
that the force of gravity and the force of the bungee cord were the reasons for
the acceleration differences on the graph. We saw that the lowest acceleration
that our man would be going going down was the acceleration of gravity, which
is -9.8m/s^2. The Table even shows the fluctuations that appeared during the
jump. We were able to use our equation of to
find how long the bungee cord was because we were able to use our acceleration
during the period of free fall and the time that the man was in free fall.
Though my
partners and I weren’t perfect (we had to drop our bungee man over again
multiple times because she would smash into the table, so it’s a good thing we
didn’t use those test runs or else the information would have been skewed; we
also used the wrong equation at first to find the length of the cord which made
the cord come out to look like 5 meters so it’s a good thing we didn’t use that
one) we were able to learn about the effects of the force of the bungee cord on
the acceleration after a free fall.
Monday, September 23, 2013
Theme in "The Darling"
“The Darling”
“The
Darling” is a short story written by Anton Chekhov in the late 1890s that
expresses a “negative commentary on the sort of woman who has no intellectual
life of her own” (Coulehan). By writing this story, Chekhov is making the
statement that women need to be more than merely “darlings” (Coulehan). He points
out the fault in the main character, Olenka; this woman fell for everything.
She accepted what came at her like it was the only thing to do, such as, adopting
the opinions of another, accepting emotional abuse, and being a pushover when
it came to business. By not being independent, Olenka showed that when one
stands for nothing, they could fall for everything.
Olenka is
often seen taking the opinions of the one closest to her at that time. The
first time there is any dialogue from her she is echoing the words of her
current husband, Kukin. She is repeating what he had said the first time his
character gets introduced. “They want a clown; what they ask for is vulgarity”
(Chekhov 212). Olenka later recites, “What they want is a clown” (213). Olenka
couldn’t bear to think for herself. In every situation she was in, she grabbed
onto the opinions of those closest to her. “She repeated the veterinary
surgeon’s words and was of the same opinion as he about everything” (218). “Her
husband’s ideas were hers” (216). And those times when she had barely anyone
around her, she clung: “Whatever Mavra, the cook, said she accepted” (219). It
didn’t matter how irreverent the opinions were to her life personally, Olenka
would take them into her life and make them pertinent. At the end of the story,
the only person in the old and grey Olenka’s life was a pre-teen boy, Sasha.
Since she had no true opinions of her own, she went on and on about the high
school. She could speak about whatever Sasha had spoken about because “Now she
had opinions of her own” (220). “Opinion transference” can be seen in mainly
women, in their 20s, who aren’t sure of what they like and are willing to do
and think anything for their boyfriend (Oxyious). Olenka showed that despite the
nature of opinion, some women would follow anything when they don’t have
anything of their own.
Also
typically seen in young women is their justification of abuse by their partner.
It will be rationalized by saying, “But I love him, and I know he loves me” or
“It was my fault; I’m so lucky he will still stay with someone like me.” Olenka
is no different. Voloditchka “would seize her by the hand” and hiss about how
she was not allowed to talk about his veterinary surgeon things and how it was
annoying (Chekov 218). She wouldn’t stand up for herself because she knew that
doing that might make him leave, which would signal the end of her opinions.
Olenka admitted that when she had the veterinary surgeon or either of her
husbands, she “could explain everything, and give her opinion about anything
you like …” (219). She tolerated this emotional and verbal abuse full
heartedly. She would apologize for these incidents, he would just smile and
they would be happy. Olenka was happy because she still had opinions to cling
onto and he was smiling and happy because abusers always are when their victim
crumples beneath them. It’s easy to believe that Olenka would gleefully put up
with that kind of behavior from someone close to her because she was so
dependent on them. After the veterinarian surgeon had emotionally abused her,
left her, and never returned, Olenka still tried to take him back into her life
by offering him everything she possessed (218-220).
That is
exactly what he and his reconciled wife did to Olenka. When she offered to let
the veterinarian surgeon, his wife, and their young son stay in her house and
that she “wouldn’t take any rent” that’s what they did (220). When she started
taking care of and living with their son Sasha, the parents did not stop them
(221-222). Olenka had becoming a landlady and a child care all rolled into one.
She had no thoughts of whether this was unjust to her. She was satisfied
because finally, after all these years, she had someone’s opinion to adhere to:
their pre-teen son, Sasha. While his mother had moved to Harkov and his father
rarely saw them, Sasha was raised by Olenka. She did not see that she was being
used, or that her house was being used. That was the kind of person Olenka was.
She was a pushover because she did not know what to do. She let this family
come in and use her.
Olenka
couldn’t make up her own mind. She had never been weaned from her parents’
opinions and henceforth she had to have someone else to rely on. This complete
reliance led her to fall for and accept everything that came into her life. She
accepted everything, even abuse a situation that is not uncommon. This behavior
can be found in addicts who have lost the ability to control their own actions.
This behavior is also present in every person in some degree. How many times
has someone’s opinion been influenced by the world around them? Chekov asks the
readers to ponder: To what degree are we like Olenka?
Work Cited
Chekhov, Anton. “The
Darling.” Perrine’s Literature:
Structure, Sound, and Sense. Tenth
Ed. Ed. Thomas Arp and Greg Johnson. Boston:
Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, 2009.
213. Print.
Coulehan, Jack. Litmed.
New York University School of Medicine, 13 Aug. 1996. Web. 18 Sept.
2013.
Oxyious. (2011, July 14). Inability to form my own opinions
while using- does this post resonate
with anyone? [Permalink]. Message
posted to http://www.soberrecovery.com/forums/
substance-abuse/231747-inability-form-my-own-opinions-while-using-does-post-resonate-anyone.html
Thursday, September 12, 2013
"Hunters in the Snow" literary analysis
“Hunters in the Snow”
“Any piece
of work is given the label as ‘literary’ if it illuminates some aspect of human
life or behavior with genuine originality and power” (Hunters). “Hunters in the
Snow” uses some of the same features as “The Most Dangerous Game,” such as the
hunt and the incident with dogs, but that is as far as they parallel. Tobias
Wolff’s short story “Hunters in the Snow” exemplifies literary fiction. The
setting shows that through the weather and the symbolism that it carries. The
deep, complicated, and real characters show a parallel to this earth we live on
right now and its people. The short story has disturbing twists and turns in
its plot that are not intended to give pleasure to the reader, but instead show
the chaos that is prevalent in the r human lives.
One
characteristic of a literary piece is symbolism. “Hunters in the Snow” is full
of symbolic references, such as the weather. In this case, the weather is
snowy, cold, and miserable to be in. Tub had to trudge through almost knee deep
snow and “the edge of the crust bruised his shins” (Wolff 89). This is near the
beginning of the story when Tub was the main character getting picked on. This
hostile weather represents how the people in his life are hostile. A change of
events occurs after Tub shoots Kenny and Kenny becomes the weak, picked on
friend. Kenny is dropped, rolled down snow, brutally throw in the back of a
freezing pick-up truck, and even his blankets are taken away by his friends to
keep them warm and leave Kenny to the elements (91-99). This cold weather that
Kenny’s experiencing is also a symbol to the coldness of peoples’ hearts. The
way his friends leave him in the cold conditions shows their lack of concern
for Kenny and their lack of empathy and responsibility as friends. Another
example of symbolism comes at the end of the story. “Right overhead was the Big
Dipper, and behind, hanging between Kenny's toes in the direction of the hospital,
was the North Star, Pole Star, Help to Sailors. … They had taken a different
turn a long way back” (99). The North Star is a classic symbol, often used as a
compass during the night. In opposition, Wolff uses the North Star to show that
they are going in a direction opposite their desired destination.
The
characters make this piece literary because of the depth Wolff gives them and
their realistic qualities of being egocentric and insensitive toward others. Man
has an inborn desire to lean toward his own self-interest and his own needs. There
was the self-interest and insensitivity when Frank and Tub took Kenny’s
blankets near the end of the story, but Kenny also has acted in self-interest.
Earlier, Kenny asked permission to hunt on a farmer’s land and he was asked to
shoot the dog (91). One might figure that Kenny figured if he didn’t agree to
put the dog down, the farmers wouldn’t let him hunt. So when Tub and the reader
found out that Kenny was actually requested to shoot the dog, one might think
nothing of his motivations but it could be that Kenny was completely self-driven
and just wanted to go hunt his deer. Also, Frank shows a rather selfish quality
when buying Tub the pancakes. He didn’t want to feed his food-loving friend,
but to justify his own vices. If Tub gave in to his weaknesses so lustfully and
eats four plates of pancakes, then he has justification to his own affair with
a fifteen-year-old girl. Wolff shows readers a view of humanity that most
people don’t want to see.
Evidence
that “Hunters in the Snow” is literary work can also been seen in the plot.
Unexpected and disturbing plot twists induce the reader to analyze the
intricate reasons for the story’s events (Hunters). The plot twists are not
designed, nor intended, to give readers the pleasure or the suspense that
commercial fiction gives. These plot twists make the reader jump back and
question why the characters chose that course of action; they make the reader
question people as they really are and their motivations. The sudden shooting
of Kenny (91) is unexpected and shocks
the readers. Before this, there was no evidence that Tub even had it in him to
shoot a man. This scene leaves the reader confused and wanting to figure out
Tub as a character. The unsettling ending also takes this work away from the
commercial fiction realm because it is not a happy or resolved ending. It is an
unsettling and indeterminate ending that consigns a reader to think about the
story long after they’ve finished reading it, pondering, and how they would
have functioned in that sort of situation.
Wolff helps
readers see into humanity at an up close point. It may use some of the same
elements as the commercial fiction story “The Most Dangerous Game,” such as the
hunt and the presence of dogs, through the symbolism, character motivations,
and plot twists, the reader is left to ponder about the world they live in.
Work Cited
“Hunters in the Snow.” Wikispaces. N.p., 13 Sept. 2009. Web.
15 Sept. 2013.
Wolff, Tobias. “Hunters in the Snow.” Perrine’s Literature: Structure, Sound, and Sense. Tenth
Ed. Ed. Thomas Arp and Greg Johnson. Boston:
Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, 2009.
86. Print.
Labels:
2013,
AP English
Tuesday, June 4, 2013
A Child’s Eyes - World War II
A
Child’s Eyes
Daddy’s
across the seas
And
will be back at an unknown date
My
mommy’s in the factories
She
always stays until very, very late
My
sister’s off with momma
My
brother’s off to war
I’m
all alone at my house
I’ve
only got myself to account for
My
uncle had come back
He
could hardly even walk
With
just one foot and a cane
And
something called “Shell Shock”
“Food
will win the war” they had said -
“Meatless
Mondays” -
The
restrictions were growing -
And
even “Wheatless Wednesdays”
“Food
was becoming scarce”, momma told me
As
we put back half of my dinner plate
Then
the next thing that started to drop
Was
my very own body weight
My
arms missed my poppa
My
stomach growled for food
When
will this all cease?
When
will this conclude?
This
war is doing nothing for me
I
can’t see its help
My
life has turned upside down
It’s
the hurt that I’ve felt.
Tuesday, May 14, 2013
My letter to the Skeptics and the Snot-Nosed, Abhorrent Humans of this World.
My letter to the Skeptics and the Snot-Nosed, Abhorrent Humans of this World.
“How do you tell if something's alive? You check for
breathing.”
― Markus Zusak, The Book Thief
It’s the simple element of life.
Things breathe to live. I don’t care if you can hold your breath for three
minutes; if you want to stay alive you got to get that air into your lungs. I
don’t think the universe cares that you think you’re the coolest fish ever and
don’t need any oxygen; it’ll kill you if you decide not to breath. Donkeys,
cats, dolphins, zebras, rodents, humans, and dromedaries all need that life-giving
gas in their bodies. But some cynics and obnoxious people might question “Why?”
or maybe even a “How?” Well if you promise not to ask me too many questions, I
might just go over all this with you.
To get a basic understanding of all
of this, we need to know the body parts associated with this amazing system.
·
The nasal cavity
is the lumpy part of your face that gets broken if you fall on your face. It’s
also the only external part of the whole respiratory system. This is where air
gets inhaled, filtered, and humidified.
·
The oral cavity
is the secondary point that the air will enter through in the respiratory
system.
·
The pharynx is
the “muscular membranous channel connecting the nasal cavity to the larynx and
the oral cavity to the esophagus; it enables breathing, ingestion of food and
speech.” (Merriam-Webster dictionary).
·
The larynx, in
simplest terms, is the voice box. It’s pretty much just a tube made with
cartilage rings. Without it, you might swallow your air and breathe in your
delicious tuna sandwich.
·
The trachea is
between the larynx and the bronchia. It’s the continuation of the larynx that
splits into two main bronchi, each leading to a different lung, and permits air
to pass.
·
The bronchi are
either of the two main branches that had split from the trachea. Coming from
the Greek word brĂ³nchos, meaning windpipe.
·
The lungs are the
main respiratory organ. It’s divided into two lobes: the right and the left.
The blood gets cleaned of carbon dioxide and enriched with oxygen that came
from the pulmonary artery.
·
The heart sends
blood through the pulmonary artery and through the lungs to be cleansed.
·
The ribs are the
bone structure that protects the lungs from any damage that might be inflicted.
To
visualize the order all of these go through, here is a handy dandy picture for
your studying pleasure.
Cool.
So do we got all of this? There are also smaller parts of the system that we
can go over when we get to them.
So starting at the very beginning let’s
say you are walking through a path that is just surrounded by dandelions. You,
loving dandelions, of course, take in a huge breath of the flower’s fragrance.
As it enters into your nostrils, the air gets purified of dust and dirt, and is
warmed. In your nose there are lateral walls that have projections called the conchae
which increase the surface area of where the air will hit. Now, on the inside
of the cavity, it is lined with respiratory mucosa which will moisten the
incoming air and trap the foreign particles that try to get in. On the superior
surface of the cavity, there are olfactory receptors in the mucosa that will
take the smell of the dandelion and tell it to the part of your brain it needs
to go so it can communicate that you indeed smell a delicious dandelion.
After the trip through the snotty
part, the air travels through the pharynx. The pharynx is, for all good
intentions, the throat. There are three regions of the pharynx. There’s (from
superior to inferior) the nasopharynx, the oropharynx, and the laryngopharynx.
The last two, the oropharynx and the laryngopharynx, are the most common
passageways for food and air.
After the pharynx, the dandelion air
will enter the larynx. The larynx (being the voice box) does allow for
vibrations and plays a role in speech, but also uses the epiglottis to direct
the food for the ingestion by closing off the respiratory tract. The larynx
routes the food and the air that come in to its proper channel. It also has the
glottis which is the opening between vocal chords and the Adam’s apple which is
a bunch of thyroid cartilage and the largest of the hyaline cartilage.
The trachea is the windpipe that
connects the larynx with the bronchi. The windpipe has its own form of removing
dust and grossness. Its ciliated mucosa is always pushing in the opposite
direction on the incoming air.
The primary bronchi are when the
trachea splits into two parts at the end and it enters the lung at the hilus.
The bronchi that goes to the right lung is like the “Yao: King of the Rock” of
the respiratory world. It’s wider, shorter, and straighter than the left
bronchi is (who probably represents Mulan in the respiratory world, she kicks
butt). The bronchi start splitting into smaller and smaller branches, the
smallest of which being the bronchioles. The bronchioles have reinforcing
cartilage, except for the very tiniest branches. The ending branches end in
alveoli. It goes from primary bronchi, to secondary bronchi, to tertiary
bronchi, to bronchiole, and ends up at terminal bronchiole.
The lungs are covered in pulmonary
(visceral) pleura. On the inside walls of the thoracic cavity parietal pleura
lines the walls. And pleural fluid fills the area between layers of pleura to
allow the lungs to be free and gliding. The lungs will expand when air is being
put into them. Without that, then our lungs would stay at a negative pressure.
The heart is important to the
respiratory system because one of the reasons for the respiratory system is to
get the oxygen back into the blood. The deoxygenated blood is being pumped
through the pulmonary veins through the lungs to get the oxygen and be returned
back to the heart so it could be sent out through the blood once again.
The ribs just keep the heart and lungs
and organs that are down there safe from any foul play by a wandering ninja or
an unemployed Power Ranger.
Now that we’ve been through the
respiratory system, I hope you will stop being one of those specifically
obnoxious people who won’t just believe when we say that it happens; and stop also
needing to know “Why?” and “How”? This system will keep you alive in the
darkest days. Until one day it doesn’t. And then you’re dead. But keep
breathing and stay alive. Markus Zusak was a very smart man.
Friday, April 26, 2013
Fitzgerald: Revisited
Fitzgerald:
Revisited
“He
wanted not association with glittering things and glittering people — he wanted
the glittering things themselves.” (Fitzgerald).
Fame and fortune has been known to drastically change
some people’s lives. From child stars who went from sweethearts to drug abusers
and middle class people who became depressed after winning the lottery, people
can flip one-eighty. This world-wide phenomenon can be seen in some of the world’s
great writers such as Ernest Hemingway who ended up committing suicide. Francis
Scott Key Fitzgerald was also affected by his sudden shove into the proverbial
limelight. From his innocent and introverted childhood, to his pursuit for
love, to the beginning of his fame and troubles, all leading to the ending
years of his life, we can see that fame had certainly gotten the best of F.
Scott Fitzgerald in the end.
Fitzgerald’s
early childhood was a normal one for the 1900’s. Two sisters, ages one and three,
died of influenza right before F. Scott was born driving his mother to be
overprotective of him. (Caudle). He grew up moving between Buffalo, New York
and Syracuse, New York because of his father’s job. The Fitzgeralds lived a
modest life though keeping work was hard for F. Scott’s father. At the age of
twelve, the family moved to St. Paul to live off the inheritance that F.
Scott’s deceased grandmother left for her daughter. With this money, his father
and mother sent him to St. Paul Academy where he stayed for two years. This is
when he was first published; it was in the school newspaper. At age fifteen, F.
Scott was sent to the Newman School in New Jersey, a prestigious Catholic
preparatory school. (Biography). He moved on to pursue his artistic abilities
in writing at Princeton University. Soon enough, Fitzgerald’s regular
coursework began to suffer, he was placed on academic probation, and dropped
out of school to enlist in the army in 1917.
Making
his way up to the command of a second lieutenant in the infantry and being
stationed at Montgomery, Alabama changed the course of his life forever. (Willett).
Afraid of dying in war, F. Scott wrote The
Romantic Egotist. The publishers turned his book down, but encouraged him
to revise it and try again. In July of 1918 at a country club dance in
Montgomery, Fitzgerald met Zelda Sayre. It was love at first sight for
Fitzgerald. Then on November 11th World War I ends before Fitzgerald
ever gets the chance to leave the U. S. This would become one of his greatest
regrets from his life. Looking to eventually marry Zelda, Fitzgerald moves to
New York and takes up the job in advertising. Not being rich or famous enough for her, Zelda
breaks off the courtship that they had and also breaks his heart. A biographer
of Fitzgerald wrote, “Unwilling to wait while Fitzgerald succeeded in the
advertisement business and unwilling to live on his small salary, Zelda Sayre
broke their engagement.” (Bruccoli). Determined to be the man of her dreams,
Fitzgerald quits his job and moves back to St. Paul to continue with his
writing career. He returned to The
Romantic Egotist revising it over and over again. This time when turned
into the same publishers it was accepted; it was revised to be entitled This Side of Paradise. He wrote to the
publisher pleading for an accelerated release. “‘I have so many things
dependent on its success—including of course a girl.’” (Milford 54). Finding
fame and fortune overnight from his new book, Fitzgerald went back to Zelda and
they married a week later in New York in St. Patrick’s Cathedral. (Shmoop).
Fitzgerald had everything in life he could want at this point: the woman of his
dreams, money, and a home in the Commodore, the newest and best hotel.
Then
the money started getting to their heads. They were kids with more money than
they knew what to do with. “They filled their first weeks with antics, and the
newspapers filled their pages with the Fitzgeralds. Scott undressed at George
White’s Scandals, Zelda dived fully
dressed in the Washington Square fountain. The media watched as the Fitzgeralds
lived life on the wind.” (Cline 87). They got kicked out of two hotels, one
being the Commodore, for their drunkenness. Their whole social life was driven
with alcoholic drinks. In public this meant falling asleep in a drunken state
at parties, but in their personal lives arguments broke out and bitter fights
were waged. (Bruccoli). Even though their lives seemed to be a huge party, they
were still just young kids in love. They had a daughter, Frances Scott
(Scottie), born in 1921. When Scottie was three, the family moved to France so
F. Scott could work on his book The Great
Gatsby. (Greatest). “Among their closest expatriate friends were Gerald and
Sara Murphy, whose daughter Honoria … remembers the Fitzgeralds as ‘a very
romantic unit. What stays with me is the way Scott looked at her with this
totally admiring look on his face. And she did look ravishing. She always wore
a peony on her left shoulder.’” (Greatest). This is how they lived there life
until 1930.
In
1930 Zelda had her first mental breakdown. F. Scott always attributed it to
Zelda’s zealous ballet practices. She would habitually practice ten hours a day
starting in 1927. After her breakdown, Zelda was admitted into then Malmaison
Clinic outside Paris. She eventually was diagnosed as a schizophrenic and told
by her doctors to stop dancing. (Americans). Having Zelda so far from F. Scott
strained their relationship and they became estranged from one another. He was
forced to stop the work on his book and start working for Hollywood as a
screenwriter to pay all of the hospital bills. In Hollywood, F. Scott took up
an affair with Sheilah Graham, a gossip columnist. In the meanwhile, Zelda was
moving to different mental hospitals up and down the East coast of the United
States. F. Scott’s and Graham’s affair lasted less than three years, ending
only at the end of his life at age forty. Sheilah Graham was with F. Scott when
he had a heart attack and died. Though his last moments were with Graham,
people still remember his heart always belonging to and being with his wife,
Zelda. (Greatest). A letter written to Zelda by the hand of F. Scott states
that he knows the happy ever after isn't there anymore but he gives the sense
that he wishes things would have turned out differently and that he still
thinks of her often. It was written the same year F. Scott died. “‘It’s odd
that my old talent for the short story vanished. It was partly that times
changed, editors changed, but part of it was tied up somehow with you and
me—the happy ending…’” (Steinkellner). Zelda and F. Scott’s daughter recalls
that even in the last days of Zelda’s life that Zelda still wrote beautiful
letters about him. “‘The tenderness is the point. That survived everything.’” (Greatest).
F.
Scott’s Fitzgerald’s life was changed by the fame and fortune that his writing
career and book publications brought him. Much like other celebrities from
today’s time, F. Scott Fitzgerald took a turn for the worst in the middle of
his walk in the limelight. In Fitzgerald’s quiet childhood he was the only kid
of his parents; his courtship to Zelda was serious and passionate. Then his
life became one big party after fame struck, changing drastically from the life
he lived before. All this lead to the estrangement from his wife and an early
death. His fame had taken over his life. But does anyone really get out of this
world without being tainted by the bright lights and the want for their name
immortalized anyway? Will you?
Works
Cited
Biography. A+E
Television Networks. Web. 24 Apr. 2013.
Bruccoli, Matthew Joseph.
Some Sort of Epic Grandeur: The Life of F. Scott Fitzgerald.
2nd ed. Columbia: University of South Carolina
Press, 2002. Print.
Caudle, Barb. Comcast.net. 8 June 2010. Web. 24 Apr.
2013.
Cline, Sally. Zelda Fitzgerald: Her Voice in Paradise.
New York: Arcade, 2004. Print.
Croasdaile, Caroline. Americans in Paris. University of
Richmond, 12 Nov. 2010. Web.
26 Apr. 2013.
Fitzgerald, F. Scott. “Winter
Dreams.” Metropolitan Magazine. Dec.
1922. Print.
“The Greatest Love
Stories of the Century.” People 12
Feb.1996: 163. Print.
Milford, Nancy. Zelda: A Biography. New York: Harper
& Row, 1970. Print.
Shmoop.com.
Shmoop University, Inc., n.d.. Web. 25 Apr. 2013.
Steinkellner, Kit. Bookriot.com. Book Riot, 18 Feb. 2013.
Web. 26 Apr. 2013.
Willett, Erika. Pbs.org. KQED Inc.. n.d.. Web. 24 Apr.
2013.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
