Luckily,
thanks to this lab, my partners and I were able to see how the length and mass
of the parts of a pendulum would make it swing differently. By using different
length of string and putting more weight on the bob, we were able to conclude
that the period of the swing depended greatly on the length of the string, but
not necessarily on the mass of the bob. This fact can be seen on my Data Table
– Part II and Part III. It can also be seen in Graph 2, which depicts the length
change, and Graph 3, which depicts the mass change. If we look back at the Data
Table – Part II, you can see a noticeable decrease in period as the length is
also decreased. In Data Table – Part III, you can see that the average period
is somewhat around the same number for the three different masses. In the
Analysis questions, it explained to us that using Newton’s laws, the period is
related to the length and free-fall acceleration by the formula:
. Besides having that equation to
reference to, we didn’t have any formulas to work out ourselves. But this
formula and Newton’s law is what brings Physics into the lab. All in all this
lab went pretty alright. The one thing I would’ve done differently if I could
was that I would have made Graph 3 more proportional looking to what it really
is. Because there really isn’t a huge amount of change in the values, but the
way the Zoom Fit worked, the values looked completely polar from each other.
But hey, that just proves human error, right?

No comments:
Post a Comment